English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18368/20624 (89%)
Visitors : 16424384      Online Users : 191
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/27687


    標題: Using a Nutritional Screening Tool to Evaluate the Nutritional Status of Patients With Colorectal Cancer
    作者: Tu, Mei-Yu
    Chien, Tsair-Wei
    Chou, Ming-Ting
    貢獻者: 醫務管理系
    關鍵字: Subjective Global Assessment
    Surgical-Patients
    Clinical-Trials
    Risk
    Malnutrition
    Hospitals
    Admission
    Agreement
    Oncology
    Albumin
    日期: 2012-02
    上傳時間: 2014-03-21 16:17:40 (UTC+8)
    出版者: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc-Taylor & Francis
    摘要: We assessed which nutrition evaluation method [subjective global assessment (SGA); malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST); nutritional risk index (NRI)] provided the most efficacious combination of high validity, low cost, and ease of use to examine and improve the status of malnutrition for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. The SGA, MUST, and NRI scales were used to analyze the preoperative status of malnutrition for 45 CRC patients in a medical center in Taiwan. Differences in the reliability of the 3 methods were compared using the kappa (kappa) coefficient of agreement. Lengths of hospital stays were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test to examine the effect or malnutrition in CRC patients. The SGA kappa coefficient was higher with the MUST than with the NRI. Preoperative and postoperative weight losses were significantly different on the NRI, and the longer the length of the hospital stay, the greater was the weight loss. Although the SGA had a higher validity and lower cost than the NRI, we recommend using the MUST method for a routine nutrition evaluation because it is easier to use and is less expensive than the SGA and the NRI.
    關聯: Nutrition And Cancer-An International Journal, 64(2), 323-330
    Appears in Collections:[醫務管理系(所)] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML1092View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback