隨著人類生活水平的提升，現代社會對於系統的倚賴程度也日益增加，系統的穩定度遂成為重要課題，為提升系統的可靠度，符合人因設計的顯示器與控制器成為必要。本研究旨在探討性質顯示裝置的相容性，特別著重在人員對顯示器與控制器之間配對操作時間上的探討。實驗分為紙筆測驗與程式測驗兩個部份，經由紙上填答與操作實體控制鍵的方式記綠受測者操作的傾向與操作時間數據。結果發現：(1)圓形控制器配對圓形性質顯示器的操作一致性與所需的總反應時間都較橫式控制器良好。(2)圓形控制器最重要的相容性反應是「順時針增量」概念；橫式控制器為「右側增量」概念，此兩項在實際操作的行為中都必需存在。(3)操作前的相容性判斷與實際操作的相容性判斷之間的差異性不大。(4)不論圓形或橫式控制器，增量或減量的操作對於總反應時間都沒有顯著影響。(5)相容性較高的時候，反應、操作所需要的時間相對較少。(6)顯示器的象限不同時，操作一致性、反應時間會受到影響。(7)不論圓形或橫式控制器，第一象限仍是最理想的配置。 With improved standards of living, modern society is increasingly dependent on the system. The system stability is an important issue. To enhance the system reliability, it is necessary to design the display and control device to conform to the compatibility. This study aimed to explore the compatibility of qualitative display device, with particular emphasis on operating time of the people to operate the different design of control and display. This study is divided into two parts, written test and simulation program test. The data of movement direction and the time of operating physical control button were collected.
The results showed that: (1)The consistency and the total reaction time of rotary controller are better than those of the horizontal controller. (2)The most important concept of the compatibility of rotary controller is clockwise-for-increase principle; that of the horizontal controller is right-for-increase principle. In practice, those two acts are necessary to present. (3)There is no significant difference of compatibility determination between pre-operation and practice. (4)Whether using rotary or horizontal controller, increment or decrement operation has no significant effect on total reaction time. (5)Using the less time to react to the stimulation and operate the controller when the compatibility is good. (6)The operation consistency and response time will be affected by the different quadrant of the display. (7)Whether rotary or horizontal controller, the first quadrant is still the best configuration.
