Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/34809
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18240/20438 (89%)
Visitors : 5481964      Online Users : 1052
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    CNU IR > Offices > 456 >  Item 310902800/34809
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/34809


    Title: Validation of an Automated Cardiothoracic Ratio Calculation for Hemodialysis Patients
    Authors: Chou, Hsin-Hsu
    Lin, Jin-Yi
    Shen, Guan-Ting
    Huang, Chih-Yuan
    Contributors: Yi Christian Hosp, Ditmanson Med Fdn Chia, Dept Pediat
    Asia Univ, Dept Bioinformat & Med Engn
    Yi Christian Hosp, Ditmanson Med Fdn Chia, Innovat & Incubat Ctr
    Yi Christian Hosp, Ditmanson Med Fdn Chia, Dept Internal Med, Div Nephrol
    Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Coll Recreat & Hlth Management, Dept Sport Management
    Keywords: cardiothoracic ratio (CTR)
    U-Net
    deep learning
    hemodialysis
    chest X-ray
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2024-12-25 11:03:53 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: MDPI
    Abstract: Cardiomegaly is associated with poor clinical outcomes and is assessed by routine monitoring of the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) from chest X-rays (CXRs). Judgment of the margins of the heart and lungs is subjective and may vary between different operators. Methods: Patients aged > 19 years in our hemodialysis unit from March 2021 to October 2021 were enrolled. The borders of the lungs and heart on CXRs were labeled by two nephrologists as the ground truth (nephrologist-defined mask). We implemented AlbuNet-34, a U-Net variant, to predict the heart and lung margins from CXR images and to automatically calculate the CTRs. Results: The coefficient of determination (R-2) obtained using the neural network model was 0.96, compared with an R-2 of 0.90 obtained by nurse practitioners. The mean difference between the CTRs calculated by the nurse practitioners and senior nephrologists was 1.52 +/- 1.46%, and that between the neural network model and the nephrologists was 0.83 +/- 0.87% (p < 0.001). The mean CTR calculation duration was 85 s using the manual method and less than 2 s using the automated method (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study confirmed the validity of automated CTR calculations. By achieving high accuracy and saving time, our model can be implemented in clinical practice.
    Relation: Diagnostics, v.13, n.8, Article 1376
    Appears in Collections:[Offices] 456

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback