Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/34687
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 18056/20254 (89%)
造访人次 : 494478      在线人数 : 610
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/34687


    標題: Impact of type of dialyzable beta-blockers on subsequent risk of mortality in patients receiving dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    作者: Yeh, Tzu-Hsuan
    Tu, Kuan-Chieh
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Chuang, Min-Hsiang
    Chen, Jui-Yi
    貢獻者: Chi Mei Hospital
    Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science
    關鍵字: pharmacokinetics
    atenolol
    carvedilol
    hemodialysis
    hypertension
    metoprolol
    blockade
    failure
    events
    日期: 2022
    上傳時間: 2023-12-11 14:05:11 (UTC+8)
    出版者: PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
    摘要: Background Beta-blockers has been reported to improve all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in patients receiving dialysis, but type of beta-blockers (i.e., high vs. low dialyzable) on patient outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed at assessing the outcomes of patients receiving dialyzable beta-blockers (DBBs) compared to those receiving non-dialyzable beta-blockers (NDBBs). Methods We searched the databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials. gov until 28 February 2022 to identify articles investigating the impact of DBBs/NDBBs among patients with renal failure receiving hemodialysis/peritoneal dialysis (HD/PD). The primary outcome was risks of all-cause mortality, while the secondary outcomes included risk of overall major adverse cardiac event (MACE), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure (HF). We rated the certainty of evidence (COE) by Cochrane methods and the GRADE approach. Results Analysis of four observational studies including 75,193 individuals undergoing dialysis in hospital and community settings after a follow-up from 180 days to six years showed an overall all-cause mortality rate of 11.56% (DBBs and NDBBs: 12.32% and 10.7%, respectively) without significant differences in risks of mortality between the two groups [random effect, aHR 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-1.02), p = 0.11], overall MACE [OR 1.03 (95% CI, 0.781.38), p = 0.82], and AMI [OR 1.02 (95% CI, 0.94-1.1), p = 0.66]. Nevertheless, the pooled odds ratio of HF among patients receiving DBBs was lower than those receiving NDBB [random effect, OR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.93), p<0.001]. The COE was considered low for overall MACE, AMI and HF, while it was deemed moderate for all-cause mortality. Conclusions The use of dialyzable and non-dialyzable beta-blockers had no impact on the risk of allcause mortality, overall MACE, and AMI among dialysis patients. However, DBBs were associated with significant reduction in risk of HF compared with NDBBs. The limited number of available studies warranted further large-scale clinical investigations to support our findings.
    關聯: PLOS ONE, v.17, n.12, e0279680
    显示于类别:[保健營養系(所) ] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML303检视/开启
    journal.pone.0279680.pdf1038KbAdobe PDF41检视/开启


    在CNU IR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈