Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/34493
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18056/20254 (89%)
Visitors : 659866      Online Users : 561
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/34493


    Title: Comparison between laryngeal handshake and palpation techniques in the identification of cricothyroid membrane: a meta-analysis
    Authors: Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Lin, Yao-Tsung
    Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
    Contributors: Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol
    Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Hlth & Nutr
    Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Ctr Gen Educ
    E Da Hosp, Dept Emergency Med
    I Shou Univ, Coll Med
    Keywords: Laryngeal handshake
    Cricothyroid membrane
    Palpation technique
    Cricothyroidotomy
    Cricoid cartilage
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2023-11-11 11:58:11 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
    Abstract: Because the use of conventional digital palpation technique for the identification of cricothyroid membrane (CTM) has been widely believed to be unreliable, the 'laryngeal handshake' technique (LH) has been introduced for CTM identification in the event of cricothyroidotomy. To provide evidence for clinical practice, this pilot meta-analysis aimed at investigating whether identification of CTM with the LH is superior to that with the palpation technique. Studies that evaluated the accuracy of CTM identification by using LH or palpation techniques (i.e., LH group vs. Palpation group) were identified from electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Medline, google scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 5, 2020. The primary outcome was the accuracy of both techniques. Four studies published from 2018 to 2020 were considered relevant and were read in full. We found no significant difference in success rate of CTM identification [Risk Ratio (RR) 1.09, 95% CI 0.89-1.34, p = 0.41] between the two groups. These preliminary results of the current study demonstrated no significant differences in success rate between the laryngeal handshake and conventional palpation techniques in cricothyroid membrane identification.
    Relation: J CLIN MONIT COMPUT, v.35, n.5, pp.1235-1238
    Appears in Collections:[Dept. of Health and Nutrition (including master's program)] Periodical Articles
    [The Center For General Education] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML143View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback