Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/34146
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18076/20274 (89%)
Visitors : 4616319      Online Users : 1207
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/34146


    Title: Evaluation of factors associated with en bloc colonic underwater endoscopic mucosal resection
    Authors: Chen, Chien-An
    Ho, Chung-Han
    Hsieh, Ping-Hsin
    Contributors: Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Hepatogastroenterol
    Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med
    Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Med Res
    Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Hosp & Hlth Care Adm
    Keywords: endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)
    endoscopic therapy
    new endoscopic technique
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2022-11-18 11:25:55 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Wiley
    Abstract: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a relatively simple and safe method for resecting sessile colorectal polyps without a submucosal injection. Only around 1000 UEMRs have been reported in a few studies, and none of the previous studies directly evaluated the factors associated with a successful en bloc resection. We retrospectively evaluated the factors associated with a successful en bloc resection using UEMR from 160 patients between August 2015 and November 2017. Of 173 polyps removed with UEMR, 141 polyps (81.5%) were removed en bloc. Univariable analysis showed that polyp size >= 20 mm (OR: 0.047, 95% CI: 0.014-0.162, P < .001), prior treatment (OR: 0.297, 95% CI: 0.135-0.655, P = .003), and polyp morphology (flat vs sessile) (OR: 0.111, 95% CI: 0.025-0.482, P = .003) were the significant factors for en bloc resection. Multivariate analysis showed that polyp size >= 20 mm (OR: 0.053, 95% CI: 0.015-0.194, P < .001), prior treatment (OR: 0.313, 95% CI: 0.118-0.832, P = .020), and polyp morphology (flat vs sessile) (OR: 0.095, 95% CI: 0.019-0.469, P = .004) were still significant. The rate of adverse events was 3.5% (n = 6) and included delayed hemorrhages (n = 2, 1.2%), muscle defects requiring endoscopic clipping (n = 3, 1.7%), and delayed perforations (n = 1, 0.6%). Polyp size < 20 mm, without prior treatment, and sessile polyp morphology were significantly associated with en bloc UEMR.
    Relation: Advances In Digestive Medicine, v.8, n.3, pp.8
    Appears in Collections:[Dept. of Hospital and Health (including master's program)] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML494View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback