English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 18076/20274 (89%)
造訪人次 : 5274219      線上人數 : 1087
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/34121


    標題: Cost-effectiveness analysis of rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in secondary prevention among patients with chronic cardiovascular diseases
    作者: Lee, Mei-Chuan
    Liao, Chia-Te
    Toh, Han Siong
    Chou, Chih-Chen
    Chang, Wei-Ting
    Chen, Zhih-Cherng
    Wu, Wen-Shiann
    Yu, Tsung
    Strong, Carol
    貢獻者: Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Pharm
    Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Coll Med
    Chi Mei Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Dept Internal Med
    Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care Med
    Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Clin Med
    Kaohsiung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Infect Dis
    Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Management, Dept Stat
    Southern Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Biotechnol
    Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Pharm
    關鍵字: Cost-effectiveness
    Rivaroxaban
    Cardiovascular diseases
    Coronary artery diseases
    Secondary prevention
    日期: 2021
    上傳時間: 2022-11-18 11:24:45 (UTC+8)
    出版者: Springer
    摘要: Purpose This study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for patients with stable cardiovascular diseases in the Taiwan setting. Methods We constructed a Markov model to project the lifetime direct medical costs and quality-adjusted life-years of both therapies. Transitional probabilities were derived from the COMPASS trial, and the costs and utilities were obtained from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database and published studies. One-way, scenario, subgroup, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was presented as the outcome. The threshold of willingness-to-pay was set at US$76,368 (3 times the gross domestic product per capita of Taiwan). All analyses were operated by TreeAge 2019 and Microsoft Excel. Results The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in the patients with stable cardiovascular diseases, coronary artery diseases, and peripheral artery diseases were US$83,459, US$69,852 and -US$13,823 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. The probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the probabilities of cost-effectiveness for the regimen with rivaroxaban among those with cardiovascular diseases and coronary artery diseases were 44.1% and 65.3% at US$76,368. Conclusion Low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin is less likely to be a cost-effective alternative to aspirin in secondary prevention for the patients with stable cardiovascular diseases; however, among these patients, the regimen may have pharmacoeconomic incentives for the group merely having chronic coronary artery diseases from the Taiwan national payer's perspective. The pharmacoeconomic incentives are influenced by the drug price, event treatment fees, and willingness-to-pay threshold.
    關聯: Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, v.35, n.3, pp.9
    顯示於類別:[藥學系(所)] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML541檢視/開啟


    在CNU IR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋