Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/34117
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 18074/20272 (89%)
造访人次 : 4293792      在线人数 : 2043
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/34117


    標題: Comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy with and without sorafenib as treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis
    作者: Que, Jenny
    Wu, Hung-Chang
    Lin, Chia-Hui
    Huang, Chung-, I
    Li, Li-Ching
    Ho, Chung-Han
    貢獻者: Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol
    Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Hosp & Hlth Care Adm
    E Da Canc Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Hematol Oncol
    E Da Canc Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol
    Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Med Res
    關鍵字: portal vein tumor thrombosis
    sorafenib
    stereotactic body radiation therapy
    日期: 2020
    上傳時間: 2022-11-18 11:24:35 (UTC+8)
    出版者: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    摘要: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a treatment option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, the treatment outcomes for patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remain poor. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of SBRT with and or without sorafenib for advanced HCC with PVTT. Fifty four HCC patients with PVTT treated with SBRT using the Cyberknife system was retrospectively analyzed between January 2009 and June 2016. Of these, sorafenib combined with SBRT was administered to 18 patients and SBRT alone was administered to 36 patients. SBRT was designed to target the liver tumor and tumor thrombosis, with a radiation dose of 36 to 45 Gy (median 40 Gy) given in 3 to 5 fractions. The mean follow-up period for SBRT with sorafenib and SBRT alone was 13.22 +/- 10.07 months and 15.33 +/- 22.01 months, respectively. The response rate was comparable in both groups. Complete response and partial response rates were 77.77% for SBRT with sorafenib and 75.00% without sorafenib (P = .43). The median progression-free survival rate was 6 months (2-11 months) versus 3 months (2-5.6 months) (P = .24) and the 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 25.7% and 15.2% versus 11.1% and 8.3% (P = .1225). The median, 1- and 2-year overall survival rates (OSR) were 12.5 months, 55.6% and 17.7% versus 7 months (5-13.5 months), 33.3% and 11.1% (P = .28), for SBRT with sorafenib versus SBRT alone groups, respectively. The result of our study shows that SBRT with sorafenib administered group resulted in a higher median, progression-free, and OSR for HCC patients with PVTT. However, the trends did not attain statistical significance. A large-scale randomized study is needed to assess the benefits of SBRT with sorafenib administration for patient with PVTT.
    關聯: Medicine, v.99, n.13, pp.9
    显示于类别:[醫務管理系(所)] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML559检视/开启


    在CNU IR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈