Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/33890
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18074/20272 (89%)
Visitors : 4081078      Online Users : 1160
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/33890


    Title: 以生命週期評估探討界面活性劑之綠色設計- 以洗髮精為例
    Green Design of Surfactant by Life Cycle Assessment - A Shampoo Case Study
    清潔劑產品生命週期各階段之環境問題探討,本研究將以洗髮精清潔劑為個案,以綠色設計與生命週期評估探討其環境問題與改善機會。研究內容主分為三大部分:第一部分,天然界面活性劑與石化界面活性劑兩者生命週期評估比較。第二部分,個案產品原料之碳足跡及生命週期評估。第三部分,以綠色設計改良洗髮精。研究結果分別:(1)椰子油界面活性劑 椰子油界面活性劑 、棕櫚油 棕櫚油 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 界面活性劑及石化原料烷基苯磺酸鹽之碳足跡分別為 2.565 kg CO2eq.、5.002 kg CO2 eq.及 2.936 kg CO2 eq.,其中以 棕櫚油界面活性劑最 棕櫚油界面活性劑最 棕櫚油界面活性劑最 高,椰子油界面活性劑最低。 高,椰子油界面活性劑最低。 高,椰子油界面活性劑最低。 高,椰子油界面活性劑最低。 高,椰子油界面活性劑最低。 (2) 生命週期評估Eco-indicator 95評價之溫室效應,以棕櫚油界面活性劑之特徵化值為4.890 kg CO2 eq.最高,其次為烷基苯磺酸鹽界面活性劑2.745 kg CO2 eq.,椰子油界面活性劑2.383 kg CO2 eq.最小;單一得點以棕櫚油界面活性劑最大,其次石化界面活性劑烷基苯磺酸鹽,最小值為椰子油界面活性劑。(3) 生命週期評估Eco-indicator 99評價之致癌物結果,以棕櫚油界面活性劑之特徵化值為2.19E-07DALY最高,其次為烷基苯磺酸鹽界面活性劑2.14E-07DALY,最小值為椰子油界面活性劑1.59E-07DALY;單一得點以棕櫚油界面活性劑最大,其次石化界面活性劑烷基苯磺酸鹽,最小值為椰子油界面活性劑。(4) 綠色設計朝向低碳之環保洗髮精,兼顧成本效益,個案模擬可選擇棕櫚油與椰子油相等比例,將具有成本效益與減碳效益之機會。
    Different environmental impact issues are from the span of the life cycle for the detergent product. This study will focus on the shampoo case study. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and green design will be available to apply for the environmental impact analyses and improvement. The study contain three parts: The first part is the comparison between natural surfactants and petrochemical surfactants by LCA. The second part is concerning with the carbon footprint and life cycle assessment of the shampoo raw materials. The third part is the shampoo improvement to be ecofriendly by green design methdology. The results are as follows: (1) In terms of carbon footprint, the value of coconut oil surfactant was at 2.565 kg CO2eq., palm oil surfactant was at 5.002 kg CO2eq. and alkylbenzene sulfonate surfactant was at 2.936 kg CO2eq., respectively.The palm oil surfactant is the highest, and coconut oil surfactant is the lowest. (2) LCA Eco-indicator 95 results, greenhouse characteristic value of the palm oil surfactant is the highest at 4.890 kg CO2eq., followed by the alkylbenzene sulfonate surfactant is at 2.745 kg CO2eq., and the coconut oil surfactant is the last at 2.383 kg CO2eq.;For the LCA single point results, the palm oil surfactant is the highest, the second is the alkylbenzene sulfonate surfactant, and the last is coconut oil surfactant. (3) The carcinogens results of LCA Eco-indicator 99 showed that the characteristic value of the palm oil surfactant is the highest at 2.19E-07DALY, followed by the alkylbenzene sulfonate surfactant is 2.14E-07DALY, the last is coconut oil surfactant at the value of 1.59E-07DALY;the palm oil surfactant is the the highest LCA single point, the second is the alkylbenzene sulfonate surfactant, and the last value is coconut oil surfactant. (4) For the green design is oriented towards the both of low-carbon environmental friendly and cost-effective for shampoo case, the scenario simulation was set at the equal proportion of palm oil and coconut oil, results indicated to be with the cost-effectiveness and carbon-reduction benefits.
    Authors: 黃珮晴
    Contributors: 環境資源管理系
    楊英賢
    Keywords: 界面活性劑
    綠色設計
    碳足跡
    生命週期評估
    green design
    carbon footprint
    life cycle assessment
    surfactant
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2022-10-21 10:27:13 (UTC+8)
    Relation: 學年度:108, 143頁
    Appears in Collections:[Dept. of Environmental Resources Management] Dissertations and Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML512View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback