English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18076/20274 (89%)
Visitors : 4668718      Online Users : 572
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/32562


    標題: Prophylactic midurethral sling insertion during transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery for advanced prolapse patients with high-risk predictors of postoperative de novo stress urinary incontinence
    作者: Lo, Tsia-Shu
    Chua, Sandy
    Kao, Chuan Chi
    Hsieh, Wu-Chiao
    Ming-Ping Wu(吳銘斌)
    Tseng, Ling-Hong
    貢獻者: Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Keelung Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol
    Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Linkou Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Urogynecol
    Chang Gung Univ, Sch Med
    Cebu Velez Gen Hosp, Cebu Inst Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol
    Chi Mei Fdn Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Urogynecol & Pelv Floor Reconstruct
    Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Ctr Gen Educ
    關鍵字: De novo stress urinary incontinence
    Continent women
    Midurethral sling
    Pelvic organ prolapse
    Predictive factor
    日期: 2019-09
    上傳時間: 2020-07-29 13:50:00 (UTC+8)
    出版者: SPRINGER LONDON LTD
    摘要: Introduction and hypothesis Our aim was to evaluate the clinical outcome of continent women with high-risk predictors for de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) offered prophylactic midurethral sling (MUS) insertion during vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery (PRS) for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Materials and methods This was a prospective cohort study in patients with POP stage >= 3 and maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) <60 cmH(2)O and functional urethral length (FUL) <2 cm. Patients were divided into PRS and PRS + MUS groups. Surgery commenced with vaginal hysterectomy, application of Uphold (R) and insertion of MUS to the PRS + MUS group. Main outcome measures were incidence of de novo urodynamic stress incontinence (USI), lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), quality of life (QoL), and topographic and anatomical relationship of implanted mesh. Results Based on sample size calculation, 40 patients were recruited-20 in each group. Rate of de novo USI in PRS + MUS was 5% objectively and 10% subjectively, while in the PRS it was 50% objectively and 60% subjectively. No significant difference was noted in patient demographics. Intraoperative blood loss was greater for PRS + MUS but was not statistically significant. No organ injuries, mesh exposure, or infections occurred. Postoperatively, MUCP significantly increased from 43.3 +/- 8.9 to 58.5 +/- 19.2 cmH(2)O and FUL from 17.2 +/- 1.9 to 20.3 +/- 3.1 mm in the PRS + MUS group. Residual urine significantly decreased. No patient had bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Sonographic assessment showed no difference in mesh mobility with urethral kinking observed in 11 (55%) patients with MUS. Conclusion Based on a validated small sample, prophylactic MUS for continent women at high risk for postoperative USI with advanced POP lowers its incidence to 5%. Continence is achieved in 95%. Concern for complications, LUTS, and QoL did not significantly differ.
    關聯: International Urogynecology Journal, v.30, n.9, pp.1541-1549
    Appears in Collections:[通識教育中心] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML1352View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback