資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/32535
|
| 標題: | Comparing short-, long-, and oblique-axis approaches to ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous catheterization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
| 作者: | Jen-Yin Chen(陳貞吟)
Li-Kai Wang(王立楷)
Yao-Tsung Lin(林耀聰)
Kuo-Mao Lan(籃國懋)
Loh, El-Wui
Chen, Chih-Heng
Tam, Ka-Wai |
| 貢獻者: | Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Anesthesiol, Chi Mei Med Ctr
Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Senior Citizen Serv Management
Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Dept Food Sci & Appl Biotechnol
Taipei Med Univ, Shuang Ho Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Hlth Care
Taipei Med Univ, Shuang Ho Hosp, Dept Med Res
Taipei Med Univ, Sch Med, Coll Med
Taipei Med Univ, Sch Med, Coll Med, Div Gen Surg,Dept Surg
Taipei Med Univ, Shuang Ho Hosp, Div Gen Surg, Dept Surg
Taipei Med Univ, Cochrane Taiwan |
| 關鍵字: | Catheterization
central venous
internal jugular vein
scanning axis
ultrasonography
meta-analysis |
| 日期: | 2019-03 |
| 上傳時間: | 2020-07-29 13:48:53 (UTC+8) |
| 出版者: | LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS |
| 摘要: | BACKGROUND: Internal jugular venous catheterization is performed for numerous therapeutic interventions. Although ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous catheterization is the gold standard for this procedure, complications can still occur. Various scanning axes, namely, the short axis (SA), long axis (LA), and oblique axis (OA), have been developed to ameliorate these complications. This study compared the efficacy and safety of SA, LA, and OA approaches. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published before September 2018. Only randomized controlled trials were included. We conducted meta-analyses using a random-effects model. Treatment efficacy was measured by total success rate, first-pass success rate, number of needle passes, and incidence of complications, namely, arterial puncture, hematoma, and catheter-related bloodstream infection. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trialswith 621 patients were included. No significant differenceswere observed in total success rate and first-pass success rate, as well as in the arterial puncture, hematoma, or catheter-related bloodstream infection complications between SA and LA approaches. Moreover, no significant difference was found between SA and OA approaches in terms of total success rate, first-pass success rate, number of needle passes, and complications of arterial puncture and hematoma. However, the number of needle passes was significantly fewer in SA approach than in LA approach (weighted mean difference, -0.18; 95% confidence interval, -0.35 to -0.01). CONCLUSION: None of the scanning axes exhibited unique features that could enhance their suitability for application. Hence, scanning axes should be selected by considering various factors that include patient characteristics, clinician expertise, and ease of procedures. Copyright (c) 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. |
| 關聯: | Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, v.86, n.3, pp.516-523 |
| 顯示於類別: | [高齡福祉養生管理系] 期刊論文
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 1155 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在CNU IR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
