| 摘要: | 本研究旨在探討南部地區居民對環境倫理觀-以新生態典範與永續社會典範比較。本研究採用問卷調查法，取樣的對象是以台南市、高雄市與屏東縣 (市) 的居民，高雄市、臺南市與屏東縣市各發出100份，問卷發放日期於民國107年4月8日至5月6日止，共計發出300份問卷，回收252份，刪除無效問卷46份，高雄市有效問卷100份、台南市有效問卷70份、屏東縣市有效問卷82份，總計有效問卷共252份，有效回收率0.84%。問卷所得資??用SPSS 統計方法進?分析，其中包含信度分析、項目分析、樣本結構分析、敘述性統計分析、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、相關分析等方法。本研究假設驗證結果摘述如下：1. 不同背景變項的南部地區居民在新生態典範量表有顯著差異，為部份成立。本研究結果發現「居住地、年齡、教育程度、職業、月收入」在新生態典範量表有顯著差異，「性別、婚姻」在新生態典範量表無顯著差異。2. 不同背景變項的南部地區居民在永續社會典範量表有顯著差異為部份成立。本研究結果發現「居住地、年齡、教育程度、職業、月收入」在永續社會典範量表有顯著差異，「性別、婚姻」在永續社會典範量表無顯著差異。3. 南部地區居民對新生態典範量表及永續社會典範量表有顯著正相關。本研究結果發現新生態典範量表之「成長的限制」、「人類中心主義」、「自然平衡的脆弱」「人類免除主義的反對」、「生態危機的可能性」等構面與永續社會典範量表的相關係數，均達顯著水準。新生態典範量表與永續社會典範量表的相關係數均為高度直線正向相關。根據研究結果，本研究針對實務應用及未?研究提出相關具體之建議與作法，未來在環境教育上，將具體及切身的環境議題作為教學素材，以及後續研究人員?考，以助於國內環境倫理的發展。
This study aims to examine the environmental ethics of residents in the southern Taiwan through a comparison between the new ecological paradigm and the sustainable social paradigm. This study used the questionnaire survey method. The sampling targets were 100 residents in each of the residents of Tainan City, Kaohsiung City and Pingtung County (City), Kaohsiung City, Tainan City and Pingtung County. The questionnaire was conducted during a period from the 8th of April to the 6th of May in 2018. Three hundred copies of questionnaire were totally completed, resulting in 252 copies valid and 46 copies invalid, in which 100 valid questionnaires were from Kaohsiung City, 70 valid questionnaires from Tainan City, and 82 valid questionnaires from Pingtung County, with a consequence of 84% of effective recovery rate. The data obtained from the questionnaire were further analyzed by SPSS statistical methods, including reliability analysis, project analysis, sample structure analysis, narrative statistical analysis, independent sample t-test, single-factor variance analysis, and correlation analysis.The results of this study hypothesis are summarized as follows:1. Residents of the southern Taiwan with different background variables have significantly different responses to the New Ecological Paradigm scale, which is partially supported by the results of the study. This study showed that residents with different residence place, age, education level, occupation, and monthly income answer significantly different responses, while residents with different gender and marriage status reply insignificantly different responses, to the New Ecological Paradigm scale.2. Residents of the southern Taiwan with different background variables have significantly different responses to the Sustainable Social Paradigm scale, which is partially supported by the results of the study. This study found that residents with different residence place, age, education level, occupation, and monthly income reply significantly different answers, while residents with different gender and marriage status reply insignificantly different answers, to the Sustainable Social Paradigm scale.3. There is a significantly positive correlation between the New Ecological Paradigm scale and the Sustainable Social Paradigm scale, which is fully supported by the responses of the southern Taiwan residents. This study demonstrated that the correlation coefficients between the New Ecological Paradigm scale and the Sustainable Social Paradigm scale are highly linear. This study proposes specific recommendations and practices for practical applications and future research. The results of the study can be used as teaching materials for environmental education and as helpful reference for follow-up researchers to promote development of environmental ethics in Taiwan. |
