Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/31778
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18074/20272 (89%)
Visitors : 4078155      Online Users : 1030
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/31778


    Title: Emission characteristics of allergenic terpenols in PM2.5 released from incense burning and the effect of light on the emissions
    Authors: Kuo, Su-Ching
    Tsai, Ying I.
    Contributors: Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Med Chem
    Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Environm Engn & Sci
    Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Indoor Air Qual Res & Serv Ctr
    Keywords: Incense burning
    PM2.5
    Indoor air quality
    Emission factors
    Allergenic substances
    Terpenols
    Date: 2017-04-15
    Issue Date: 2018-11-30 15:56:23 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Elsevier Science Bv
    Abstract: This study investigated allergenic terpenol compounds in incense powder and smoke. The powder of two Thai brands contained higher concentrations of terpenols up to 6.15 times higher than those of two Taiwanese brands. Consequently, Thai incense makers face a higher potential risk of contact dermatitis than Taiwanese incense makers do. D-Limonene was the primary terpenol compound in the powder of Thai B (64.0%) and Thai Y (31.5%), sold in Thailand. By contrast, anisyl alcohol was the primary terpenol compound in the powder of LST (40.3%) and SC (37.7%), sold in Taiwan. After the four brands of incense were ignited, their mean PM2.5 emission factor was 18.02 +/- 6.20 mg g(-1) incense. The PM2.5 mass emission factors of the Taiwanese brands were far higher than those of the Thai brands, and so were the PM2.5 terpenol emission factors, showing that the smokes of the Taiwanese incense were potentially more allergenic than those of the Thai incense. Geraniol, the most allergenic terpenol compound, was 2.8%-10.7% of total terpenol compounds in the powder of the four brands, yet was the main contributor to PM2.5, constituting 66.3%-83.5% of terpenol compounds in the smokes of the four brands. Furthermore, geraniol exhibited an IP ratio, defined as the incense/powder (IP) ratio of terpenol-related species, >1 in all four brands, and >5 in the Taiwanese brands, suggesting a greater health risk with the smoke from the Taiwanese incense. The IP ratios of other terpenol species were all <1, indicating decomposition through combustion. Additionally, the light/darkroom ratios of the terpenol species were >1, meaning that the generation of PM2.5 terpenol compounds was potentially enhanced by indoor lighting. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All lights reserved.
    Relation: Science of The Total Environment, v.584, pp.495-504
    Appears in Collections:[Dept. of Environmental Engineering and Science (including master's program)] Periodical Articles
    [Dept. of Food & Drug Industry and Inspective Technology] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML1351View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback