Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/29130
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 18076/20274 (89%)
造访人次 : 5293140      在线人数 : 1292
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/29130


    標題: 以生命週期評估探討塑木低碳應用
    Low-carbon Investigation of Wood Plastic Composites by Life Cycle Assessment
    作者: 黃依婷
    貢獻者: 環境工程與科學系
    楊英賢
    關鍵字: 塑木複合材
    碳足跡
    生命週期評估
    生態效益
    Wood Plastic Composites
    Carbon Footprint
    Life Cycle Assessment
    Eco-efficiency
    日期: 2014
    上傳時間: 2015-10-26 20:24:18 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究以生命週期評估探討臺灣塑木產品之環境衝擊與生態效益,並研究產品如何導向綠色產品。以木材、傳統塑膠(HDPE)及塑木為個案,探討三者之環境衝擊與生態效益,其環境衝擊包括能源投入、碳足跡、生態毒性與其他環境衝擊類別。研究結果主要包括四大部分,第一部分為個案產品生命週期評估環境衝擊結果;第二部分為個案之能源投入、碳足跡與生態毒性;第三部分為產品生態效益比較;第四部分為環境改善方案模擬。每公斤之功能單位之結果顯示: (1)產品生命週期評估,以HDPE能源投入較高(118.04MJ),其次為塑木產品為(70.45MJ),能源投入較低產品為木材(23.12MJ);(2)產品碳足跡以塑木最低為8.10kgCO2-eq.其次為木材8.27kgCO2-eq.;(3)產品生態效益以HDPE較優5.62NT$/kgCO2-eq.,其次為塑木3.85NT$/kgCO2-eq.;(4)以熱泵替代傳統窯乾法改善方案,可減少2.35MJ能源投入,並可減少碳足跡5.73kgCO2-eq.;在防腐處理減量方案之生態毒性比較,添加木材防腐劑可增加產品使用年限,然將增加產品之生態毒性。
    The study focused on environmental impact and eco-efficiency for wood of Taiwan by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and guide for the green products. Compare with environmental impacts and eco-efficiency among the wood, high density polyethylene (HDPE) and wood plastic composites (WPC) according to the energy inputs, carbon footprint, ecological toxicity and other environmental impact categories. The results contain four parts, the first part was LCA results and interpretation; the second part was the energy consumption, carbon footprint and eco-toxicity among three materials; the third part of eco-efficiency results; and the last was environmental improvement simulations. The results indicated, (1)About LCA results, the HDPE energy was with 118.04MJ, the next was WPC with 70.45MJ, and the least was the wood with 23.12MJ, respectively; (2)The carbon footprint of WPC was less with 8.10 KgCO2-eq., the next was wood with 8.27kgCO2-eq.; (3)The HDPE eco-efficiency was better than the WPC, the value was 5.62NT$/kgCO2-eq. and 3.85NT$/kgCO2-eq.; (4)The heat pump alternation decreased by 2.35MJ energy input compared with the dry kiln process, and the carbon footprint benefit with 5.73kgCO2-eq.; Compare with the wood preservation and free preservation scenarios, the benefit indicate increasing the using lifetime but increasing the eco-toxicity value span the life time.
    關聯: 網際網路公開:2017-07-31,學年度:102,215頁
    显示于类别:[環境工程與科學系(所)] 博碩士論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML1152检视/开启


    在CNU IR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈