Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/28708
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18034/20233 (89%)
Visitors : 23730559      Online Users : 787
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/28708


    Title: The impact of central line insertion bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infection
    Authors: Tang, Hung-Jen
    Lin, Hsin-Lan
    Lin, Yu-Hsiu
    Leung, Pak-On
    Chuang, Yin-Ching
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    Contributors: 保健營養系
    Keywords: Central line bundle
    Central line-associated bloodstream infection
    Intensivist
    Date: 2014-07
    Issue Date: 2015-05-06 21:25:57 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Biomed Central Ltd
    Abstract: Background: Knowledge about the impact of each central line insertion bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is limited. Methods: A quality-improvement intervention, including education, central venous catheter (CVC) insertion bundle, process and outcome surveillance, have been introduced since March 2013. Outcome surveillances, including CLABSI per 1,000 catheter-days, CLABSI per 1,000 inpatient-days, and catheter utilization rates (days of catheter use divided by total inpatient-days), were measured. As a baseline measurement for a comparison, we retrospectively collected data from March 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012. Results: During this 10-month period, there were a total of 687 CVC insertions, and 627 (91.2%) insertions were performed by intensivists. The rate of CLABSI significantly declined from 1.65 per 1000 catheter-day during the pre-intervention period to 0.65 per 1000 catheter-day post-intervention period (P = 0.039). CLABSI more likely developed in subjects in which a maximal sterile barrier was not used compared with subjects in which it was used (P = 0.03). Moreover, CVC inserted by non-intensivists were more likely to become infected than CVC inserted by intensivists (P = 0.010). Conclusions: This multidisciplinary infection control intervention, including a central line insertion care bundle, can effectively reduce the rate of CLABSI. The impact of different care bundle varies, and a maximal sterile barrier precaution during catheter insertion is an essential component of the care line insertion bundle.
    Relation: Bmc Infectious Diseases, v.14, 356
    Appears in Collections:[Dept. of Health and Nutrition (including master's program)] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML1549View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback