Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/26982
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18076/20274 (89%)
Visitors : 5269274      Online Users : 1334
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/26982


    Title: Adsorptive Removal of Cu(II) from Aqueous Solution using Non-Crosslinked and CrosslinkedChitosan-Coated Bentonite Beads
    Authors: Maria Lourdes, P.Dalida
    Ana Francia, V.Mariano
    Cybelle, M.Futalan
    Kan, Chi-Chuan
    Tsai, Wan-Chi
    Wan, Meng-Wei
    Contributors: 環境工程與科學系
    Keywords: Adsorption isotherm
    Bentonite
    Chitosan
    Crosslinking
    Desorption
    Date: 2011-07
    Issue Date: 2013-10-16 09:08:38 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Elsevier
    Abstract: Batch experiments were executed to investigate the removal of Cu(II) from aqueous solutions using non-crosslinked (CCB) and crosslinked chitosan-coated (CCB-ECH) bentonite beads. CCB and CCB-ECH beads were characterized by BET surface area and pore diameter analysis and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The percentage removal and adsorption capacity of Cu(II) ions were examined as a function of initial concentration and pH. The equilibrium data of CCB agreed well with the Langmuir model while CCB-ECH beads showed a better fit with the Freundlich model. Based on the isotherm study, CCB is a homogenous adsorbent, whereas CCB-ECH is a heterogeneous adsorbent. The adsorption capacities of CCB and CCB-ECH at pH 4 are 12.21 and 9.43 mg/g, respectively. The kinetic data correlated well with the pseudo-second order equation, which implies that chemisorption is the rate-limiting step. The desorption study was performed using eluent solutions, tap water (pH 7) and HCl solution (pH 1 and pH 3). The best Cu(II) recovery was obtained using HCl solution (pH 1).
    Relation: Desalination, 275(1-3), pp.337-343
    Appears in Collections:[Dept. of Environmental Engineering and Science (including master's program)] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2600View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback