English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18055/20253 (89%)
Visitors : 25105996      Online Users : 503
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/26715


    Title: Intrathecal propranolol displays long-acting spinal anesthesia with a more sensory-selective action over motor blockade in rats.
    Authors: Chen, Yu-Wen
    Chu, Chin-Chen
    Chen, Yu-Chung
    Hung, Ching-Hsia
    Wang, Jhi-Joung
    Contributors: 休閒保健管理系
    Keywords: Propranolol
    Clonidine
    Spinal anesthesia
    Date: 2011-09
    Issue Date: 2013-06-21 16:52:26 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Elsevier
    Abstract: To prevent cardiovascular effects of peripherally administered propranolol, the aim of this study was to evaluate the spinal anesthetic effect of propranolol, a Na± channel blocker. After rats were injected with drugs intrathecally, the spinal anesthetic effect of propranolol was compared with that of lidocaine, which is known to produce local anesthesia. We also evaluated the effect of the addition of clonidine with propranolol on spinal anesthesia. Our results showed that propranolol produced a dose-dependent spinal blockade in motor, proprioception, and nociception. On a 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, the spinal anesthetic effect of propranolol in motor, proprioception, and nociception [1.16 (1.01–1.34), 1.10 (0.92–1.31), 1.05 (0.89–1.24)] was equal to lidocaine [1.03 (0.94–1.13), 0.95 (0.84–1.07), 0.87 (0.79–0.96)], respectively. On an equipotent basis (0.5, 1.0, 2.5 μmol), the sensory/nociceptive block duration caused by propranolol was longer than that caused by lidocaine (P ≤ 0.01). Co-administration of propranolol (1.1 μmol) and clonidine (0.5 μmol) produced greater spinal anesthesia than propranolol (1.1 μmol) or clonidine (0.5 μmol) alone. These preclinical findings demonstrated that propranolol produces similar spinal anesthesia to lidocaine and that α2-adrenergic receptors also contribute to improve the quality and duration of the spinal anesthetic effect of propranolol. Propranolol with a more sensory-selective action over motor blockade elicited longer spinal blockade than did lidocaine.
    Relation: European Journal of Pharmacology 667(1-3), pp. 208-214
    Appears in Collections:[Dept. of Recreation and Health-Care Management] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2026View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback