Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/24605
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18076/20274 (89%)
Visitors : 4868187      Online Users : 852
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/24605


    Title: 健保安寧末期病患緩和鎮靜利用之探討
    A population based study of palliative sedation for hospice patients with terminal illness in Taiwan
    Authors: 陳莠諠
    Contributors: 嘉南藥理科技大學:醫療資訊管理研究所
    楊美雪
    Keywords: 緩和鎮靜
    末期病患
    安寧
    palliative sedation therapy
    terminal patients
    hospice
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2011-10-26 15:41:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 目的:了解國內安寧末期病患緩和鎮靜使用情形,並探討緩和鎮靜對末期病患存活之影響。方法:回溯性描述2005年健保抽樣歸人檔之2005年至2009年間安寧末期病患緩和鎮靜之使用情形。運用Kaplan-Meier進行有無緩和鎮靜病患之存活分析。結果:研究期間安寧末期病患有275人,使用類鴉片藥物、抗精神病藥物與/或鎮靜安眠藥物的緩和鎮靜病患有248位(90.2%)。在248人中,使用類鴉片藥物的末期病患最多有232人(93.5%),抗精神病藥物與鎮靜安眠藥物則比較少分別有122人(49.2%)與115人(46.4%)。末期病患常使用的緩和鎮靜藥物為morphine有212人(85.5%),haloperidol有103人(41.5%)與midazolam有76人(30.6%)。有緩和鎮靜之末期病患的平均存活時間為18.3天比無緩和鎮靜之末期病患的8.4天長,且其存活曲線顯著高於無緩和鎮靜的病患(log rank test p=0.002)。結論:本研究發現末期病患之緩和鎮靜以緩解疼痛為主,緩和鎮靜對於病患末期生命並無負面的影響。
    Objective: To describe the utilization of palliative sedation therapy (PST) among hospice patients with terminal illness and examine the effect of on survival in terminally ill patients. Methods: The study conducted a descriptive retrospective study based on the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID) from 2005 to 2009 of a systematic sample of hospice patients. Comparative survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests. Results: During the study period, 275 hospice patients with terminal illness were recorded of which 248 patients (90.2%) were administered opioids, antipsychotics and/or hypnotics and sedatives. Out of these, the drugs used for PST were opioids in 232 (93.5%), antipsychotics in 122 (49.2%) and hypnotics and sedatives in 115 (46.4%). The most common drug used was morphine (85.5%). Haloperidol and midazolam were used by 41.5% and 30.6% of the PST patients respectively. Patients who received PST had a longer mean survival (18.3 days) than those who did not received PST (8.4 days). The mortality rate derived from the Kaplan-Meier curve was higher in PST patients than no-PST patients (log-rank test p=0.002). Conclusion: The results find that the majority of terminally ill cancer patients used PST for the control of pain and PST did not have a negative effect on patient survival time.
    Relation: 校內校外均不公開,學年度:99,84頁
    Appears in Collections:[Dept. of Hospital and Health (including master's program)] Dissertations and Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML1751View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback