| 摘要: | 本研究針對環保署主辦的99年度「低碳社區推動計畫」所遴選出來南台灣總計14個低碳推動社區，包括嘉義市2個、台南市4個、高雄市4個、屏東縣2個、台東縣2個，分別為嘉義市頂庄社區、番社社區，台南市二行社區、天埔社區、重興社區、文南社區，高雄市金山社區、文賢社區、正義社區、鼎泰社區，屏東縣墾丁社區、永樂社區，台東縣萬安社區、都蘭社區做為本論文之研究對象。
調查方式是以親自到社區深入觀察與評估，就低碳發展之面向，詢問社區居民目前社區之村里組成與發展程度後，整理分析社區調查之資料，進而就可判斷社區目前現況與未來減碳的改善條件。
主要研究目的包括調查14個低碳推動社區之基本特性與自然條件、調查14個社區的用電及用水現況紀錄，以分析家戶用水用電的每年每人平均碳排量，分析都市型社區與鄉村型低碳社區之碳排量差異性、調查14個社區的發展組織與社區營造現況，以探討未來該社區推動低碳社區施作及營造的潛能、調查各社區在低碳社區推動六大主軸的現況與未來發展條件、分析及歸納14個社區目前已進行的低碳優良做法，以提供其他村里推動低碳社區的參考、建立資源循環面向施作項目評估之架構及分析都市型社區與鄉村型社區施作適合度與分析資源循環施作項目評估之分數與各社區人口密度間之關聯。
研究結果指出，若要在社區施作自然淨化系統，依照結果可得知在都市型社區適宜施作自然淨化系統之人口密度範圍為1500至4000人/平方公里，最佳施作條件是在人口密度1547人/平方公里，施作條件為最佳；在鄉村型社區適宜施作自然淨化系統之人口密度範圍為65至125人/平方公里左右，因為鄉村型社區可利用土地多，所以在鄉村型社區施作自然淨化系統為比較優勢，如果若要在都市型社區施作雨水收集系統，適宜施作之人口密度範圍為1500至36591人/平方公里；在鄉村型社區適宜施作自然淨化系統之人口密度範圍為65至831人/平方公里左右，以結果得知在都市型社區施作自然淨化系統為比較優勢，但是跟人口密度較無直接關係。
This research EPA hosted 99 annual "carbon community-driven project," the selection out of a total of 14 carbon southern Taiwan to promote community, including Chiayi City 4, Tainan City 4, Kaohsiung 4, Pingtung County 2 , Taitung County 2, respectively, the Chiayi City is din- in community & Fan-She community, Tainan City, is er-xing community & day-Po community & Chung-hing Community & Wen-nan Community,the Kaohsiung city is Jin-shan community & Wen-Yin community & Zheng-yi community & Din-Tai community, the Pingtung County is Ken-ting community & Yung-lo community,the Taitung county is Wanan community & Port-land community,As this paper's study.Method of investigation is the person to the community in-depth observation and assessment, For the low-carbon development, Ask community residents of the village community composition and the current level of development, The Community survey and analyzed the data, And thus can determine the status of current and future community and reduce carbon emissions to improve conditions.Main research purposes including the investigation of 14 low-carbon communities to promote basic features and natural conditions, the survey of 14 communities the status of record electricity and water, household water and electricity to analysts the average carbon emissions per person per year, analysis of urban communities low-carbon communities and rural differences in carbon emissions, the survey of 14 community development organizations and communities to create a condition in order to explore the future of the community to promote low-carbon community facilities and create the potential for the investigation of the community in promoting the six low-carbon communities major axis of the current status and future conditions, analyze and summarize the 14 communities has been conducted in low-carbon good practice to provide additional reference to the village to promote low-carbon community, the establishment of recycling facilities for the project for assessment and analysis of urban structure Community and rural-based community facilities for fitness and analysis of resource recycling facilities for the project assessment scores and the association between population density communities. The study concluded that, to the community facilities for the natural purification system, Accordance with the results that, in the urban community facilities for the natural purification system suitable for population density range of 1500-4000 people / square kilometer, the best facilities for the conditions in the population density of 1547 persons / sq km, the best facilities for the conditions; in the village type of community facilities for the natural purification system suitable for population density range of 65 to 125 people / square kilometer or so, because the rural-based community can make use of the land, therefore the type of community facilities in rural areas for the natural purification system for comparative advantage.If applied to the urban community as a rainwater collection system, Suitable facilities for the population density range of 1500-36591 people / sq km. In the village type of community facilities for the natural purification system suitable for population density range of 65 to 831 / square kilometers, with the result that, in the urban community facilities for the natural purification system for comparative advantage, but with no direct relationship between population density compared. |
