Metabolic syndrome defined by IDF and AHA/NHLBI correlates better to carotid intima-media thickness than that defined by NCEP ATP III and WHO

doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2009.06.020

CNU IR > College of Sustainable Environment and Recreation > Dept. of Occupational Safety > Periodical Articles > Item 310902800/23264

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/23264

Title:	Metabolic syndrome defined by IDF and AHA/NHLBI correlates better to carotid intima-media thickness than that defined by NCEP ATP III and WHO
Authors:	Wen-Ya Ma Hung-Yuan Li Chi Sheng Hung Mao-Shin Lin Fu-Chun Chiu Cheng-Hsin Lin Shyang-Rong Shih Lee-Ming Chuang Jung-Nan Wei
Contributors:	職業安全衛生系
Keywords:	Carotid intima-media thickness Atherosclerosis Metabolic syndrome
Date:	2009-09
Issue Date:	2010-11-19 11:50:20 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	Aims We conducted this study to compare the relationships between subclinical atherosclerosis and metabolic syndrome (MS) defined by four definitions in Chinese subjects. Methods In 2006–2007, we enrolled 140 Chinese subjects without reported diabetes in this study. Anthropometric, biochemical profile, and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) were measured. MS was defined by International Diabetes Federation (IDF), American Heart Association and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (AHA/NHLBI), National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panal III (NCEP-ATP III), and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Results Subjects with MS defined by IDF and AHA/NHLBI criteria had significantly higher carotid IMT, controlling for age, gender, smoking, and serum LDL-C (MS by IDF, partial r = 0.225, p = 0.008; AHA/NHLBI, partial r = 0.176, p = 0.04). The association between carotid IMT and MS defined by NCEP-ATP III or WHO criteria was not significant. Subjects with more components of MS defined by IDF, AHA/NHLBI, or NCEP-ATP III criteria correlated to higher carotid IMT in adjusted models (p-values for trend, MS by IDF, 0.011; AHA/NHLBI, 0.011; NCEP-ATPIII, 0.01; WHO, 0.113). Conclusion MS definitions by IDF and AHA/NHLBI criteria are the best among four definitions in detecting subclinical atherosclerosis in non-diabetic Chinese subjects; whereas MS defined by WHO criteria is the worst.
Relation:	Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 85(3)：p.335-341
Appears in Collections:	[Dept. of Occupational Safety] Periodical Articles

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	2648	View/Open

Loading...