Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/22090
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18055/20253 (89%)
Visitors : 25215305      Online Users : 552
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    CNU IR > Chna Nan Annual Bulletin > No.27 (2001) >  Item 310902800/22090
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/22090


    Title: 天賦人權與革命民權適用時期之比較研究
    The research between natural rights and revolution of human rights
    Authors: 余元傑
    李麗雲
    Contributors: 人文社會教育中心
    青少年兒童福利系
    Keywords: 天賦人權
    革命民權
    Natural Rights
    Revolution od Human Rights
    Date: 2001
    Issue Date: 2010-03-24 16:45:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以天賦人權與革命民權異同出發,試圖從二種觀念的比較,找出其個別時代背景意義,進而探討民主政治發展過程中所適用時期.國父主張革命民權,與如梭提倡天賦人權,雖同樣為了爭平等.反對君權,卻以不同觀點解釋權利來源,產生背景不同導致結果也有差異.對盧梭強調的民權為上天賦予,人生而自由.平等,國父完全不以為然,反認為自由不是天生的,是由人民奮鬥而來,平等也是人為的.革命民權思想在國父民權主義中佔有重要地位,而其發生時代背景為民國建立初年,適逢國內革命潮流低落,國父為激發革命黨人爭取民權,甚至批評盧梭天賦人權的謬誤.他以歷史進化觀點說明,民權英事時勢和潮流所造就出來,藉此強化革命民權的理論基礎.面臨中國內政紛亂.軍閥割據與帝國勾結,國父主張適可提高人民政治道德與行使民權能力,提供政治現代化理論
    Relation: 嘉南學報 27 : p.299-306
    Appears in Collections:[The Center For General Education] Periodical Articles
    [Dept. of Social Work] Periodical Articles
    [Chna Nan Annual Bulletin] No.27 (2001)

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback