English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 16974/19261 (88%)
Visitors : 7688658      Online Users : 489
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/9617


    標題: 社區環境面向之調查分析-以高雄縣參與環保署清淨家園計畫之社區為例
    A Study on Environmental Reforms of Community at Lujhu Township, Kaohsiung County
    作者: 陳懷德
    Huai-Te Chen
    貢獻者: 彭衍順
    嘉南藥理科技大學:環境工程與科學系所
    關鍵字: 社區營造
    社區環境改造計畫
    清淨家園計畫
    Community Empowerment
    Environmental Reform
    日期: 2008
    上傳時間: 2008-12-29 15:19:17 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 十八世紀工業化、都市化以來,各先進國家乃藉由推展社區組織及社
    區發展工作來培養基層社區之自助與互助能力。我國文建會與環保署亦紛
    紛提出社區營造等相關政策,迄今已有十多年之久,受到各界熱烈響應與
    討論。本研究主要目的在於探討環保署所推動的「清淨家園計畫」及「社
    區環境改造計畫」的環境效應,研究主體為具執行前述計畫經驗之高雄縣
    路竹鄉竹滬與鴨寮社區,並輔以不具前述執行計畫經驗之竹東與社中社區
    作為比較對照之基準。本研究主要藉由問卷調查及社區領導人之深度訪
    談,進一步分析與否具環保署相關計畫執行經驗之差異性,包括居民滿意
    度、社區凝聚力及議題之形成方式等面向之探討。希冀能藉由本研究的分
    析與結果,瞭解與探討社區的現況與差異,提供後續相關研究之參考。
    研究結果顯示,曾經參與環保署相關計畫的社區環境民眾滿意度、凝
    聚力以及推動相關活動等面向均優於不具執行經驗之社區。透過與社區領
    導人深度訪談,發現多數社區於推動環境改造活動時,主要遇到之困難為
    經費之不足以及私人土地取得之困難。此現象仍需政府相關單位之協助與
    輔導,方能使社區營造之理念推廣至全國社區。
    Community is a basic unit of people living. Community empowerment is
    one of the most important element for community development. Hence Council
    for Cultural Affairs (CCA) and Environmental Protection Administration (EPA)
    have been implemented various policies to enhance community empowerment.
    For example, environmental reforms of community (ERC) have been
    implemented by EPA since 1997 and have received positive responses from
    local communities.
    The purpose of this study is to evaluate the environmental performance of
    environmental reforms implemented by Jhuhu commune, Yaliao commune,
    Jhudong commune and Shejhong commune at Lujhu Township, Kaohsiung
    County. Jhuhu commune andYaliao commune used to carry out ERC. On the
    contrary, Jhudong commune and Shejhong commune have no experience of
    ERC. The evaluation was conducted by both questionnaire and depth interview
    to reflect various aspects including satisfaction questionnaire, community
    consensus, community issues and so on. Based on the results of this work, it can
    provide not only the current status of community empowerment but also the
    important references in the future.
    In terms of satisfaction questionnaire, community consensus and
    community issues, the results indicated the communes with ERC superior to the
    communes without ERC. The main difficulties in ERC were lack of budget and
    insufficient land used. Overall, the contribution from governmental section still
    plays a very important role in community empowerment. The further integration
    of different sectors is the groundwork for success in community.
    Appears in Collections:[環境工程與科學系(所)] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML333View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback