English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 18034/20233 (89%)
造訪人次 : 23776445      線上人數 : 745
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/34136


    標題: Dosimetric comparison between RapidArc and HyperArc techniques in salvage stereotactic body radiation therapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    作者: Ho, Hsiu-Wen
    Lee, Steve P.
    Lin, Hisu-Man
    Chen, Hsiao-Yun
    Huang, Chun-Chiao
    Wang, Shih-Chang
    Yang, Ching-Chieh
    Lin, Yu-Wei
    貢獻者: Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol
    Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles
    Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Pharm
    關鍵字: Recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    RapidArc
    HyperArc
    Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
    Dosimetric comparison
    Biologically effective dose (BED)
    日期: 2020
    上傳時間: 2022-11-18 11:25:29 (UTC+8)
    出版者: Bmc
    摘要: Background To evaluate dosimetric differences of salvage irradiations using two commercially available volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) techniques: RapidArc (RA) and HyperArc (HA), for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after initial radiation therapy. Methods Ten patients with recurrent NPC status previously treated with radiation therapy were considered suitable candidates for salvage SBRT using VMAT approach. Two separate treatment plans were created with HA and RA techniques for each case, with dosimetric outcomes compared with respect to tumor target coverage and organs-at-risk (OARs) sparing. Furthermore, the cumulative radiobiological effects to the relevant OARs from the original radiotherapy to the respective salvage SBRT plans were analyzed in terms of biologically effective dose (BED). Results Treatment with HA exhibited similar target dose coverage as with RA, while delivering a higher mean dose to the targets. Using RA technique, the mean maximal doses to optic apparatus and the mean brain dose were reduced by 1 to 1.5 Gy, comparing to HA technique. The conformity index, gradient radius, and intermediate dose spillage in HA plans were significantly better than those in RA. With HA technique, the volume of brain receiving 12 Gy or more was reduced by 44%, comparing to RA technique. The cumulative BEDs to spinal cord and optic apparatus with RA technique were 1 to 2 Gy(3)less than those with HA. HA technique significantly reduced the volume within body that received more than 100 Gy. Conclusions With better dose distribution than RA while maintaining sufficient target dose coverage, HA represents an attractive salvage SBRT technique for recurrent NPC.
    關聯: Radiation Oncology, v.15, n.1, pp.11
    顯示於類別:[藥學系(所)] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    10.1186s13014-020-01602-7.pdf2195KbAdobe PDF110檢視/開啟
    index.html0KbHTML342檢視/開啟


    在CNU IR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋