English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 18034/20233 (89%)
造訪人次 : 23773347      線上人數 : 785
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/34120


    標題: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Oral Anticoagulants in Stroke Prevention among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Taiwan
    作者: Liao, Chia-Te
    Lee, Mei-Chuan
    Chen, Zhih-Cherng
    Ku, Li-Jung Elizabeth
    Wang, Jung-Der
    Toh, Han Siong
    貢獻者: Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol
    Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Publ Hlth
    Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Pharm
    Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Pharm
    Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care Med
    Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Clin Med
    關鍵字: Anticoagulant therapy
    Atrial fibrillation
    Cost-effectiveness analysis
    日期: 2020
    上傳時間: 2022-11-18 11:24:43 (UTC+8)
    出版者: Taiwan Soc Cardiology
    摘要: Background: Non-vitamin K oral antagonist anticoagulants (NOACs) have been widely used in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacoeconomic impact of oral anticoagulants (OACs) including warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in SPAF in Taiwan. Methods: A decision tree, Markov model, and multiple sensitivity analyses were used to project the lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of OACs. Transitional probabilities were derived from a systematic review and network meta-analysis for Asian populations. Utilities and costs were obtained from published studies and the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Threshold of the willingness to pay (WTP) at USD 20,000 was applied to evaluate the results. Results: In base-case analysis, warfarin had the lowest cost at $13,363 4,036, and edoxaban 60 mg produced the most QALYs at 11.92 +/- 1.98. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of dabigatran 150 and 110 mg, rivaroxaban 20 and 15 mg, apixaban 5 mg, and edoxaban 60 mg versus warfarin were $6,415, $4,225, $4,115 and $5,458 per QALY gained, respectively. Monte Carlo analysis revealed that dabigatran 150 and 110 mg, rivaroxaban 20 and 15 mg, apixaban 5 mg and edoxaban 60 mg were most cost-effective at 21.9%, 27.1%, 23.6%, and 27.4% of $20,000 compared to warfarin. Conclusions: From a Taiwan national payer perspective, all NOACs are cost-effective substitutes for warfarin in SPAF. However, the likelihood of cost-effective iterations for NOACs is highly driven by their market prices at the time and different WTP thresholds of policymakers.
    關聯: Acta Cardiologica Sinica, v.36, n.1, pp.12
    顯示於類別:[藥學系(所)] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    10.6515_ACS.202001_36(1).20190511A.pdf701KbAdobe PDF108檢視/開啟
    index.html0KbHTML308檢視/開啟


    在CNU IR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋