Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/32274
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18034/20233 (89%)
Visitors : 23600960      Online Users : 739
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/32274


    Title: Cross-Validation of Two Commonly Used Self-Stigma Measures, Taiwan Versions of the Internalized Stigma Mental Illness Scale and Self-Stigma Scale-Short, for People With Mental Illness
    Authors: Chang, Chih-Cheng
    Lin, Chung-Ying
    Gronholm, Petra C.
    Wu, Tsung-Hsien
    Contributors: Chi Mei Med Ctr
    Kings Coll London
    Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci
    Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Hong Kong
    Keywords: confirmatory factor analysis
    severe mental disorders
    multitrait-multimethod analysis
    item-response theory
    self-stigma
    Date: 2018-09
    Issue Date: 2019-11-15 15:47:43 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
    Abstract: Self-stigma instruments investigate how people with mental illness internalize public stigma. However, information is limited for the psychometric properties of their scores, especially cross-validating scores from different instruments. Thus, we used confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) and item-response theory (IRT) models to examine the Internalized Stigma Mental Illness (ISMI) scale and the Self-Stigma Scale-Short (SSS-S). Participants with mental illness (n = 347) completed both instruments. The CFAs that simultaneously accounted for both the instrument (ISMI and SSS-S) and the trait (Affect, Cognitive, and Behavior concepts) effects outperformed those that accounted only for the instrument effect or only the trait effect. All item scores fit the IRT model and were fit with ordered, progressing hierarchies in their step difficulties. We conclude that both instruments are feasible for measuring the self-stigma and that future research can combine the items of both.
    ???metadata.dc.relation.uri???: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191116658547
    Relation: Palliative Medicine, v.25, n.6, pp.777-792
    Appears in Collections:[Dept. of Recreation and Health-Care Management] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML1097View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback