English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 16909/19260 (88%)
Visitors : 7556322      Online Users : 465
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/27638


    標題: Hemoglobin A1c for the diagnosis of diabetes: To replace or to guide oral glucose tolerance tests?
    作者: Li, Hung-Yuan
    Ma, Wen-Ya
    Wei, Jung-Nan
    Lin, Mao-Shin
    Shih, Shyang-Rong
    Hung, Chi Sheng
    Hua, Cyue-Huei
    Chuang, Lee-Ming
    貢獻者: 職業安全衛生系
    關鍵字: Diagnosis
    Hemoglobin A1C
    Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
    日期: 2012-06
    上傳時間: 2014-03-21 16:16:05 (UTC+8)
    出版者: Wiley-Blackwell
    摘要: Aims/Introduction: To evaluate if hemoglobin A1c (A1C) can replace the use of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to diagnose diabetes in Chinese patients. Materials and Methods: Subjects without pre-existing diabetes were included in this community-based study. Each participant received a 75-g OGTT and A1C tests. Results: A total of 1362 subjects, 512 men and 850 women, aged 1888 years, were enrolled. The prevalence of diabetes was 7.4 and 7.3% by OGTT and by A1C = 6.5% criteria, respectively. The optimal A1C cut-off for diabetes defined by OGTT was 6.1%. The performance of A1C = 6.1% to find diabetes by OGTT was poor, with a kappa 0.50, sensitivity 80% and specificity 91%. Using current criteria of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 5.56 mmol/L to exclude and =7 mmol/L to diagnose diabetes (FPG criterion), the sensitivity, specificity and OGTT required were 77.2, 100 and 13.5%, respectively. Using A1C < 5.9% to exclude and =7.0% to diagnose diabetes (A1C criterion), the sensitivity, specificity and OGTT required were 89.1, 99.8 and 26.5%, respectively. However, using FPG < 5.56 mmol/L and A1C < 6.1% to exclude, and A1C = 7.0% to diagnose diabetes (A1C plus FPG criterion), the sensitivity, specificity and OGTT required were 85.2, 100 and 18.9%, respectively. Conclusions: To screen for diabetes, the A1C criterion is more sensitive than the FPG criterion, with more OGTT needed. The A1C plus FPG criterion reduced the number of OGTT needed with acceptable sensitivity. A1C can guide, but cannot replace, OGTT to diagnose diabetes. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2011.00181.x, 2011)
    Appears in Collections:[職業安全衛生系(含防災所)] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML316View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback