English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 16974/19261 (88%)
Visitors : 7699774      Online Users : 201
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/27023


    標題: The Performance of Risk Scores and Hemoglobin A1c to Find Undiagnosed Diabetes with Isolated Postload Hyperglycemia
    作者: Li1, Hung-Yuan
    Lin, Mao-Shin
    Shyang-Rong ShihChiao8), Jung-Nan Wei8)
    Hua, Cyue-Huei
    Liu, Yu-Lai
    Chuang, Lee-Ming
    Sung, Fung-Chang
    Chen, Ming-Fong
    Lee, Jin-Chuan
    Ching-Hsiang
    貢獻者: 職業安全衛生系
    關鍵字: Isolated postload hyperglycemia
    Risk score
    Impaired fasting glucose
    日期: 2011-06
    上傳時間: 2013-10-23 11:55:50 (UTC+8)
    出版者: Japan Soc Biosci Biotechn Agrochem
    摘要: The aim of this study is to develop strategies to screen diabetic subjects with isolated postload hyperglycemia (IPH) in Chinese population. We included 1175 adult subjects who did not report diabetes were included. Diabetes was diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance tests. IPH was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG)<7 mmol/L and 2-hour post-load plasma glucose (2hPG) greater than 11.1 mmol/L. Using FPG criteria, only 59.8% of diabetic subjects were not identified, showing a poor agreement between FPG and 2hPG criteria (kappa 0.294). Age, FPG, total cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure, body mass index, HbA1c and medication for hypertension were associated factors for IPH. Four scores were constructed using all these factors, age and blood test results, age and HbA1 c, and data from non-invasive examinations, respectively. The area under the ROC curve were 0.9296(95%CI 0.8948-0.9643), 0.9111(95%CI 0.8713-0.9508), 0.8902(95%CI 0.8341-0.9646), 0.8924(95%CI 0.7835-0.8753), and 0.8654(95%CI 0.7963-0.9345) for score 1, 2, 3, 4, and HbA1 c, respectively. The sensitivity of all four risk scores to detect IPH was better than that of impaired fasting glucose (IFG). The sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c at cutoff 6.2% for detecting IPH was also better than that of IFG. In conclusion, the risk scores and HbA1c are useful to identify subjects with undiagnosed IPH, with better performance than IFG.
    Appears in Collections:[職業安全衛生系(含防災所)] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML356View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback