Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science Institutional Repository:Item 310902800/21717
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18034/20233 (89%)
Visitors : 23595061      Online Users : 742
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/21717


    Title: 應用SERVQUAL量表建構中醫醫療服務品質指標
    Applying the SERVQUAL Questionnaire to Establish Quality Indicators for Chinese Medicine
    Authors: 蔡文正
    龔佩珍
    翁瑞宏
    張永賢
    李思儀
    Contributors: 醫療資訊管理研究所
    Keywords: 中醫
    醫療服務品質
    SERVQUAL量表
    分析層級程序法
    驗證性因素分析
    Chinese Medicine
    Health Care Service Quality
    SERVQUAL Questionnaire
    Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Confirmatory Factor Analysis
    Date: 2008-08
    Issue Date: 2009-10-12 11:48:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 目標:為確保總額支付制度實施後之中醫醫療服務品質,建立中醫院所的醫療品質指標有其必要性。本研究欲應用SERVQUAL量表來建立中醫醫療服務品質評估指標。方法:先以專家座談方式,建立中醫醫療服務品質指標項目,再以分析層級程序法對於所建立之構面與指標給予不同的重要性權重,以區分指標間之重要性,之後再以全國910位中醫病患問卷結果進行驗證性因素分析,以檢驗品質指標的建構效度。結果:共訂定五個評估構面共22項指標,其中「有形性構面」5項、「可靠性構面」4項、「回應性構面」5項、「保證性構面」4項、「同理心構面」4項。各構面的相對權重如下:「有形性構面」為0.122、「可靠性構面」為0.354、「回應性構面」為0.145、「保證性構面」為0.238、「同理心構面」為0.141。驗證性因素分析結果亦顯示,本研究所訂定之品質指標的鑑別效度與收斂效度皆屬良好。結論:本研究所建構之指標可作為醫務管理者進行中醫醫療服務品質評估或研究時的重要參考。
    Objectives: In order to assure quality health care after the implementation of global budgeting payments at our institutions, it was necessary to establish quality indicators for Chinese medicine services. The SERVQUAL questionnaire was used to build a set of Chinese medicine service quality indicators. Methods: The expert panel method was applied to build up the appropriate indictors for Chinese medicine service quality, and the analytic hierarchy process was employed to establish the importance of each dimension or indicator. Further, for testing the construct validity of quality indicators, we adopted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to analyze the questionnaires of 910 Chinese medicine outpatients. Results: The result of this research has set 5 dimensions and 22 indicators that include 5 tangible indicators, 4 reliability indicators, 5 responsiveness indicators, 4 assurance indicators and 4 empathy indicators. The weight for each dimension is the following: 0.122 for the tangible aspect, 0.354 for the reliability aspect, 0.145 for the responsiveness aspect, 0.238 for the assurance aspect and 0.141 for the empathy aspect. In addition, the CFA indicated that convergent validity and the divergent validity of the quality indicators established by this study are all acceptable parameters. Conclusions: Health care managers can use these indicators set by this research to evaluate or study the service quality for Chinese medicine.
    Relation: 臺灣公共衛生雜誌 27(4):p.309-319
    Appears in Collections:[Dept. of Hospital and Health (including master's program)] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    0KbUnknown2256View/Open


    All items in CNU IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback